Skip to main content

Clashing views on marriage equality in Minnesota
A movie about how marriage equality prevailed in Minnesota shows how "unwinnable" elections can be won. See a preview of it at Netroots Nation on Friday.
Everything you think you know about persuading voters may be wrong.

This is the hard-learned lesson LGBT activists discovered after 29 straight defeats in fighting conservatives who wanted to write discrimination into state constitutions and laws across the nation banning same-sex marriage.

In nearly every campaign, they outspent the conservatives by a large margin, had motivated volunteers and used impeccable logic about why their side was right.

And every time, they were blown out of the water when conservatives scared the hell out of people by running ads saying if gay marriage was legal, your third grade kids would be taught how "a princess could marry a princess."

Every time, people voted to protect their kids.  Conservatives won — but not because they had reduced their message to a few words. They won because they scared people into thinking emotionally instead of logically. And it worked every time… until 2012, when Minnesota became the first state to reject a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage — and then in a dramatic turn, approved marriage equality just a few months later.

This, even though poll after poll showed the "one man, one woman" constitutional amendment was going to be a "slam dunk" win for Republicans and drive voter turnout so they could increase their majorities in the Minnesota legislature and win the U.S. Senate race.

The amendment did drive voter turnout… but in the wrong direction.  Republicans lost control of both houses of the Minnesota legislature, its U.S. Senate candidate lost in a landslide and a Republican-authored constitutional amendment to require photo ID to vote also lost.

What changed the game in Minnesota?  Yes, the national mood on marriage equality was changing — President Obama said in 2012 his view on same-sex marriage had "evolved."  Yes, it was a presidential election year that generally favored Democrats. But something else had to be happening to make such a dramatic turn — something that made Minnesota the tipping point in this epic civil rights battle.  Something that prevented people from getting scared and instead led them to make a logical decision.

That "something" is documented in a movie about the marriage equality battle in Minnesota that shows how progressives can win elections that used to be "unwinnable".  I will talk about the movie and show a few key clips from it at Netroots Nation this Friday at 11am as part of "Reel Action to Real Action: A Showcase of Activism and Film" in room 142C.

When campaign volunteer Steven Davis was told how the Minnesota campaign was going to be run, he was not happy with the approach. "I think if you approach people and rationally talk about rights that the average person will react rationally," said Davis. "I was not crazy about that plan.  But I was very wrong."

Even if you've been doing it wrong for years, you can win when you get it right.  It's one of the inspiring things about this movie that has a real Hollywood type story to tell — the good guys win against impossible odds, and love conquers all.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site