Skip to main content

You ought to be out raising hell. This is the fighting age. Put on your fighting clothes.
-Mother Jones

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Saturday July 16, 1904
Recommended Book for All Hellraisers: Unionism and Socialism by Eugene Debs

Unionism and Socialism by Eugene Debs, ad in Appeal to Reason of July 16, 1904
The above advertisement for the new book by Eugene Debs, Unionism and Socialism, appears in today's edition of the Appeal to Reason. We highly recommend this book to all Unionist and Socialist, and we are pleased to be able to present a few pages from the beginning of the book:

Unionism and Socialism by Eugene V Debs, Cover, 1904

UNIONISM AND SOCIALISM


 By EUGENE V. DEBS
----------

The labor question, as it is called, has come to be recognized as the foremost of our time. In some form it thrusts itself into every human relation, and directly or indirectly has a part in every controversy.

A thousand "solutions" of the labor question find their way into print, but the question not only remains unsolved, but steadily assumes greater and graver proportions. The nostrums have no effect other than to prove their own inefficiency.

There has always been a labor question since man first exploited man in the struggle for existence, but not until its true meaning was revealed in the development of modern industry did it command serious thought or intelligent consideration, and only then came any adequate conception of its importance to the race.

Man has always sought the mastery of his fellow man. To enslave his fellow in some form and to live out of his labor has been the mainspring of human action.

To escape submission, not in freedom, but in mastery over others has been the controlling desire, and this has filled the world with slavery and crime.

In all the ages of the past, human society has been organized and maintained upon the basis of the exploitation and degradation of those who toil. And so it is today.

The chief end of government has been and is to keep the victims of oppression and injustice in subjection.

The men and women who toil and produce have been and are at the mercy of those who wax fat and scornful upon the fruit of their labor.

The labor question was born of the first pang of protest that died unvoiced in the breast of unrequited toil.

THE LABOR MOVEMENT

The labor movement of modern times is the product of past ages. It has come to us for the impetus of our day, in pursuit of its world-wide mission of emancipation.

Unionism, as applied to labor in the modern sense, is the fruit and flower of the last century.

In the United States, as in other countries, the trade union dates from the beginning of industrial society.

During the colonial period of our history, when agriculture was the principal pursuit, when the shop was small and work was done by hand with simple tools, and the worker could virtually employ himself, there was no unionism among the workers.

When machinery was applied to industry, and mill and factory took the place of the country blacksmith shop; when the workers were divorced from their tools and recruited in the mills; when they were obliged to compete against each other for employment; when they found themselves in the labor market with but a low bid or none at all upon their labor power; when they began to realize that as toolless workingmen they were at the mercy of the tool-owning masters, the necessity for union among them took root, and as industry developed, the trade union movement followed in its wake and became a factor in the struggle of the workers against the aggressions of their employers.

Richard T Ely, 1903
In his search for the beginnings of trade unionism in our country, Prof. Richard T. Ely, in his "Labor Movement in America," says:
I find no traces of anything like a modern trades union in the colonial period of American history, and it is evident, on reflection, that there was little need, if any, of organization on the part of labor at that time." * * *

Such manufacturing, as was found, consisted largely in the production of values-in-use. Clothing, for example, was spun and woven, and then converted into garments in the household for its various members. The artisans comprised chiefly the carpenter, the blacksmith and the shoemaker; many of whom worked in their own little shops with no employes, while the number of subordinates in any one shop was almost invariably small, and it would probably have been difficult to find a journeyman who did not expect, in a few years, to become an independent producer.

This was the general condition from the labor standpoint at the close of the eighteenth century. But with the dawn of the new century and the application of machinery and the spread of industry that followed came the beginning of the change. The workers gradually organized into unions and began to take active measures to increase their wages and otherwise improve their condition. Referring to this early period in the rise of unionism, the same author records the incident of one of the first strikes as follows:
Something very like a modern strike occurred in the year 1802. The sailors in New York received ten dollars a month, but wished an increase of four dollars a month, and endeavored to enforce their demands by quitting work. It is said that they marched about the city, accompanied by a band, and compelled seamen, employed at the old wages, to leave their ships and join them. But the iniquitous combination and conspiracy laws, which viewed concerted action of laborers as a crime, were then in force in all modern lands, and "the constables were soon in pursuit, arrested the leader, lodged him in jail, and so ended the earliest of labor strikes."
This sounds as if it had been the occurrence of yesterday, instead of more than a hundred years ago. The combination and conspiracy laws have been repealed, but the labor leader fares no better now than when these laws were still on the statute books. The writ of injunction is now made to serve the purpose of the master class, and there is no possible situation in which it can not be made to apply and as swiftly and surely strike the vital point and paralyze the opposition to the master's rule.

We need not at this time trace the growth of the trade union from its small and local beginnings to its present national and international proportions; from the little group of hand-workers in the service of an individual employer to the armies of organized and federated workers in allied industries controlled by vast corporations, syndicates and trusts. The fact stands forth in bold relief that the union was born of necessity and that it has grown strong with the development of industry and the increasing economic dependence of the workers.

A century ago a boy served his apprenticeship and became the master of his trade. The few simple tools with which work was then done were generally owned by the man who used them; he could provide himself with the small quantity of raw material he required, and freely follow his chosen pursuit and enjoy the fruit of his labor. But as everything had to be produced by the work of his hands, production was a slow process, meagre of results, and the worker found it necessary to devote from twelve to fifteen hours to his daily task to earn a sufficient amount to support himself and family.

It required most of the time and energy of the average worker to produce enough to satisfy the physical wants of him self and those dependent upon his labor.

There was little leisure for mental improvement, for recreation or social intercourse. The best that can be said for the workingman of this period is that he enjoyed political freedom, controlled in large measure his own employment, by virtue of his owning the tools of his trade, appropriated to his own use the product of his labor and lived his quiet, uneventful round to the end of his days.

This was a new country, with boundless stretches of virgin soil. There was ample room and opportunity air and sunlight, for all.

There was no millionaire in the United States; nor was there a tramp. These types are the products of the same system. The former is produced at the expense of the latter, and both at the expense of the working class. They appeared at the same time in the industrial development and they will disappear together with the abolition of the system that brought them into existence.

The application of machinery to productive industry was followed by tremendous and far-reaching changes in the whole structure of society. First among these was the change in the status of the worker, who, from an independent mechanic or small producer, was reduced to the level of a dependent wage-worker. The machine had leaped, as it were, into the arena of industrial activity, and had left little or no room for the application of the worker's skill or the use of his individual tools.

The economic dependence of the working class became more and more rigidly fixed-and at the same time a new era dawned for the human race.

The more or less isolated individual artisans were converted into groups of associated workers and marshalled for the impending social revolution.

It was at this time that the trades union movement began to take definite form. Unorganized, the workers were not only in open competition with each other for the sale of their labor power in the labor market, but their wages could be reduced, and their hours of labor lengthened at will, and they were left practically at the mercy of their employers.

It is interesting to note the spirit evinced by the pioneers of unionism, the causes that impelled them and the reasons they assigned for banding themselves together in defense of their common interests. In this connection we again quote from Professor Ely's "Labor Movement in America," as follows:

The next event to attract our attention in New York is an address delivered before "The General Trades Unions of the City of New York" at Chatham street chapel, on December 2, 1833, by Eli Moore, president of the union. This General Trades Union, as its name indicates, was a combination of subordinate unions "of the various trades and arts in New York City and its vicinity," and is the earliest example in the United States, so far as I know, of those Central Labor Unions which attempt to unite all the workingmen in one locality in one body, and which have now become so common among us. The address of Mr. Moore is characterized by a more modern tone than is found in most productions of the labor leaders of that period. The object of these unions is stated to be "to guard against the encroachments of aristocracy, to preserve our natural and political rights, to elevate our moral and intellectual condition, to promote our pecuniary interests, to narrow the line of distinction between the journeyman and employer, to establish the honor and safety of our respective vocations upon a more secure and permanent basis, and to alleviate the distresses of those suffering from want of employment."
This is a remarkably clear statement of the objects of unionism in that early period, and indicates to what extent workingmen had even then been compelled to recognize their craft interests and unite and act together in defense thereof.

So far, and for many years later, the efforts of trades-unions were confined to defensive tactics, and to the amelioration of objectionable conditions. The wage-system had yet to develop its most offensive features and awaken the workers to the necessity of putting an end to it as the only means of achieving their freedom; and it was this that finally forced the extension of organized activity from the economic to the political field of labor unionism.

As the use of machinery became more general and competition became more intense; as capital was centralized and industry organized to obtain better results, the workers realized their dependence more and more, and unionism grew apace. One trade after another fell into line and raised the banner of economic solidarity. Then followed strikes and lockouts and other devices incident to that form of warfare. Sometimes the unionists gained an advantage, but more often they suffered defeat, lost courage and abandoned the union, only to return to the scene of disaster with renewed determination to fight the battle over again and again until victory should at last perch upon the union banner.

[emphasis and photographs added]

SOURCES

Appeal to Reason
(Girard, Kansas)
 -of July 16, 1904
http://www.newspapers.com/...

Unionism and Socialism: A Plea for Both
 -by Eugene Victor Debs
Standard Publishing Company, 1904
http://books.google.com/...

See also:

The labor movement in America
 -Richard Theodore Ely
Crowell, 1886
http://books.google.com/...

Richard T Ely
http://en.wikipedia.org/...

Ten blind leaders of the blind
 -by Arthur M. Lewis.
Charles H Kerr, 1910
Chapter IV. Prof. Richard T. Ely.
https://archive.org/...

IMAGES
1). "This Is Socialism"
http://www.newspapers.com/...
2). Cover: Unionism and Socialism
(click on cover, then scroll down a few pages)
http://books.google.com/...
3). Richard T Ely
http://en.wikipedia.org/...

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
The Workers' Song-Dropkick Murphys

We're the first ones to starve the first ones to die
The first ones in line for that pie-in-the-sky
And always the last when the cream is shared out
For the worker is working when the fat cat's about

                                 -Ed Pickford

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Originally posted to Hellraisers Journal on Wed Jul 16, 2014 at 11:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Shamrock American Kossacks, In Support of Labor and Unions, Anti-Capitalist Chat, and History for Kossacks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm no Luddite (6+ / 0-)

    but have come to believe that many of our problems are rooted in industrialization.  I read a great analysis of this somewhere several years back, wish I could remember where!  But up until then, the family was the economic unit - they grew their own crops, raised their own cows and sheep and pigs, spun their cloth, sewed their clothes - in fact, there were very few things they weren't able to produce for themselves, and those they bartered for in the village market.  Every member of the family contributed to its upkeep and had a function as a part of the family.  Then, with industrialization, goods could be mass-produced much more cheaply, but to be efficient large factories located in cities (or soon-to-become cities) were necessary, and this led to the depopulating of the small communities where families had previously lived, married, raised children for generations, with all the continuity and extended supports that such an existence could provide.

    Many benefits to society have no doubt resulted from industrialization but not without significant costs.  Whatever rules supposedly guided capitalism, like the principle of supply and demand, have changed - we produce much more than we need or can use, which leads to waste and designed obsolescence, not to mention exploitation.  It makes you wonder whether the production is the end rather than the means to the end sometimes.  Maybe it just becomes a blind rat race that gets beyond anyone's control.  The production glut leads to our negatively impacting third world local economies, like when we dump our surplus agriculture on them.

    The capitalist society that has emerged is a Frankenstein monster, whatever the merits or deficiencies of its original design, and it's wreaking havoc on the unwitting populace.  I think Debs is right about the role government has played in being the enforcer for the "master class" - just as Smedley Butler was right in concluding that his entire career had been spent furthering the ends of corporate masters.

    Great diary, I've bookmarked this and will do some more reading at the links you provided.

    What the people want is very simple. They want an America as good as its promise. - Barbara Jordan

    by penelope pnortney on Wed Jul 16, 2014 at 01:15:30 PM PDT

    •  Thank you for your thots penelope. (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Cadillac64, penelope pnortney, kharma

      I esp like the imagery of Frankenstein monster:

      The capitalist society that has emerged is a Frankenstein monster, whatever the merits or deficiencies of its original design, and it's wreaking havoc on the unwitting populace.  I think Debs is right about the role government has played in being the enforcer for the "master class" - just as Smedley Butler was right in concluding that his entire career had been spent furthering the ends of corporate masters.
      I've been wanting to read "Unionism and Socialism" for a long time, so I was very happy to find it online!

      God spare me the Heart to fight them... I'll fight the Pirates forever. -Mother Jones

      by JayRaye on Wed Jul 16, 2014 at 01:39:50 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Our schools don't teach labor history (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kharma, JayRaye, Galtisalie

    Glad to see this diary.

    "The Democrats and the Republicans are equally corrupt where money is concerned. It's only in the amount where the Republicans excel." ~ Will Rogers

    by Lefty Coaster on Thu Jul 17, 2014 at 04:51:01 AM PDT

  •  Yo soy Debs. Thank you for this diary. n/t (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JayRaye

    garden variety democratic socialist: accepting life's complexity|striving for global stewardship of our soil and other resources to meet everyone's basic needs|being a friend to the weak

    by Galtisalie on Thu Jul 17, 2014 at 04:51:29 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site